Web basemark

Author: t | 2025-04-23

Basemark offers a range of benchmarking tools, including Basemark GPU, Basemark Web 3.0, and Basemark Automotive. These tools cover a variety of scenarios, from gaming to web performance to

Basemark Releases Basemark Web 3.0 with WebGL 2.0

Basemark launched Basemark GPU, a graphics performance evaluation tool for systems with Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL 4.5 or OpenGL ES 3.1 graphics APIs. This tool enables the industry to objectively and reliably quantify and compare graphics performance of next generation mobile, automotive and desktop processors. "We have poured all of our soul and expertise in making this product. The work started two and half years ago and this massive project has culminated in today's launch of a true state-of-the-art product," said Arto Ruotsalainen, CEO of Basemark. "We believe Basemark GPU will become an essential tool for anyone tasked to evaluate graphics performance in systems ranging from smart phones, smart TVs and cars to PCs."Basemark GPU supports multiple operating systems with Android, Windows and Linux support released today. Support for additional graphics APIs such as Metal and DirectX 12 and operating systems such as Apple iOS will be added in the coming months. The product uses Rocksolid Engine by Basemark, which enables the tester to execute identical workloads across many different devices and technologies, thus enabling advanced GPU profiling from many angles.Basemark GPU is developed in close cooperation with key player semiconductor companies, such as Imagination Technologies, Intel, NVIDIA, Qualcomm and Renesas within Basemark's benchmark development program. This close cooperation with the leading GPU and CPU companies of the world ensures that the benchmark will be extremely reliable and also represent the utmost in objectivity.Versions and AvailabilityBasemark GPU is available immediately as a free app for consumer usage from Google Play and here. For commercial and business usage, Basemark offers the tool with various licensing options. Contact Basemark for further information.About BasemarkBasemark Oy is a privately held stock corporation registered and headquartered in Helsinki, Finland. The company develops Rocksolid Engine, a world leading real-time graphics and compute software solution for mission critical industrial applications. Basemark also develops system performance evaluation tools such as Basemark GPU and Basemark Web 3.0. Basemark offers also professional software & design services across embedded, industrial and enterprise markets.Download (Guru3D file-mirror). Basemark® GPU is a multi-platform, multi-API 3D-graphics benchmark. It enables a comparison of the graphics performance of different smartphones and tablets. You can even compare the performance to Notebooks or PCs. This is possible because our benchmarks utilize Rocksolid®, our industrial-grade graphics & compute engine. The desktop version runs an AAA quality game-like workload by default, but also offers a test identical to the mobile version in this app. Written in C++ and platform-independent, Rocksolid allows for truly objective and efficient multi-platform benchmarking. Basemark GPU allows the user to compare their device to others around the world. For that, this free version of the benchmark always submits test scores to the Basemark Power Board web service. If you need a Basemark GPU license for a commercial usage please contact us. To circumvent VSync limitations on mobile devices, we render each benchmark frame off-screen and display only a miniature image of each frame on the screen. This way we can make sure that no frame is dropped, and the results are accurate. If you want to see the graphics in full glory, please choose Experience Mode. After installation, Basemark GPU, like some games, needs to download its graphical assets. This may take a while and is crucial for the tests. If you’re on a capped mobile data plan, you may want to connect to Wi-Fi.

Basemark Web 3.0 - GPUScore

Basemark® GPU ist ein Multi-Plattform-Multi-API-3D-Grafik-Benchmark. Es ermöglicht einen Vergleich der Grafikleistung verschiedener Smartphones und Tablets. Sie können die Leistung sogar mit Notebooks oder PCs vergleichen. Dies ist möglich, weil unsere Benchmarks Rocksolid® verwenden, unsere industrietaugliche Grafik- und Computing-Engine. In der Desktop-Version wird standardmäßig eine spielähnliche Workload in AAA-Qualität ausgeführt, es wird jedoch auch ein Test angeboten, der mit der mobilen Version in dieser App identisch ist.Rocksolid wurde in C ++ geschrieben und ist plattformunabhängig. Es ermöglicht ein wirklich objektives und effizientes Multi-Plattform-Benchmarking. Mit der Basemark-GPU kann der Benutzer sein Gerät mit anderen auf der ganzen Welt vergleichen. Dafür sendet diese kostenlose Version des Benchmarks immer Testergebnisse an den Basemark Power Board-Webservice. Wenn Sie eine Basemark-GPU-Lizenz für eine kommerzielle Nutzung benötigen, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte.Um VSync-Einschränkungen auf Mobilgeräten zu umgehen, rendern wir jeden Benchmark-Frame außerhalb des Bildschirms und zeigen nur ein Miniaturbild jedes Frames auf dem Bildschirm an. Auf diese Weise können wir sicherstellen, dass kein Frame gelöscht wird und die Ergebnisse korrekt sind. Wenn Sie die Grafiken in voller Pracht sehen möchten, wählen Sie bitte den Erlebnismodus. Nach der Installation muss die Basemark-GPU, wie einige Spiele, ihre grafischen Elemente herunterladen. Dies kann eine Weile dauern und ist für die Tests von entscheidender Bedeutung. Wenn Sie einen begrenzten Tarif für mobile Daten haben, möchten Sie möglicherweise eine Verbindung zu Wi-Fi herstellen.. Basemark offers a range of benchmarking tools, including Basemark GPU, Basemark Web 3.0, and Basemark Automotive. These tools cover a variety of scenarios, from gaming to web performance to

Basemark Web 3.0 scores - TechPowerUp

For multimedia content creation. Macs run the benchmark via Rosetta 2 emulation.This test is one in which the M3 iMac makes a name for itself, achieving the leading result. This indicates even better media editing performance than before, as well as decent file export and conversion times. However, it's surprising to see the M3 generally matched or surpassed by an Intel processor. The era of Apple desktop performance dominance seems to be ending. Even so, you can expect a seamless and slick work experience from the latest iMac.Finally, we run Macs through a series of browser-based performance tests. First is JetStream 2, which puts the system through 64 JavaScript and WebAssembly benchmarks. WebXPRT 3 from Principled Technologies includes HTML tests and more JavaScript throughput tests. Last, we run Basemark Web 3.0, which further exercises systems with a variety of JavaScript plug-ins and other web tools, but notably adds WebGL 2.0 testing for online graphics performance.With a limited number of reliable benchmarks available, we primarily use these tests as a means of measuring improvements across generations of Macs or between current models. Here we saw that the M3 chip indeed pushes Apple's processing platform beyond the M1 and M2 generations, especially outpacing the M2 Pro (and bucking the trend seen elsewhere in these charts).Graphics and Game TestingWe begin our macOS graphics testing with the cross-platform 3DMark Wildlife Extreme running in Unlimited mode (higher scores are better). With nine more GPU cores, the dominance of the Mac mini's M2 Pro was scarcely surprising.Next is GFXBench 5, a cross-platform test we use to compare performance across Windows and Mac. This benchmark stresses both low-level routines like texturing and high-level, game-like image rendering. The 1440p Aztec Ruins and 1080p Car Chase tests, rendered offscreen to accommodate different display resolutions, exercise graphics and compute shaders The GPU compute test because our version of Geekbench 5 doesn't support the proper graphics API, although we expect the performance to be equally poor because the Duet 5 only has integrated graphics. Single-Thread N/A Multi-Thread N/A Cinebench R23 doesn't work on Chrome OS. That said, we expect the Qualcomm Snapdragon SC7180 SoC to perform poorly in CPU rendering tasks. CPU Render Time N/A GPU Render Time N/A GPU Render Time (Optix) N/A We can't perform the Blender benchmark because the software can't detect the CPU or GPU. It's likely that Blender just doesn't support the ARM-based Qualcomm Snapdragon SC7180 SoC. Overall Score 1,847 The Lenovo IdeaPad Duet 5 performs terribly in the Basemark GPU benchmark. It scores even lower than the older Lenovo Chromebook Duet (2020). It can handle most games from the Google Play Store, but you'll likely see some stutters in graphically demanding titles. Sequential Write Speed 137.0 MB/s Sequential Read Speed 159.4 MB/s Random Write Speed 2.5 MB/s Random Read Speed 5.9 MB/s The Lenovo Chromebook Duet 5's storage drive performs poorly. It has slow read and write speeds, so it can take a while to transfer files or install and launch a large app. However, the system still feels reasonably responsive because Chrome OS is a lightweight operating system with minimal background processes, and most tasks are web-based. Capacity 42 Wh Battery Life (Web Browsing) 10.5 hrs Battery Life (Video Playback) 7.8 hrs Battery Life (Gaming) 6.7 hrs Charge Time 2.7 hrs The Lenovo Chromebook Duet 5 has great battery life. You can get easily through a typical 8-hour workday of light productivity with some charge to spare. Video playback drains the battery faster, but it's still enough for a couple of full-length movies. It lasts an incredibly long time for gaming, among the longest

Basemark Web 3.0 Launches – The Industry

The best Chromebooks are simpler alternatives to traditional laptops for people who don’t need high-powered computing. They’re meant for light usage and feature long battery life.Our top pick is the Acer Chromebook 516 GE (available at Amazon) . Not only is it powerful and well-built, but it was designed specifically for cloud gaming. If that’s not your jam, there are plenty of other options from traditional clamshell bodies to versatile 2-in-1s. Credit: Reviewed / Kris Wouk Other Laptops We TestedHow We Test ChromebooksSince Chromebooks aren’t sold for processing power, we adjust our testing accordingly. We do benchmark the processor. But we generally focus on usability, including the quality of the screen and keyboard, and other factors like battery life. We rate overall usability by combining these factors into a weighted score. Credit: Reviewed.com / Jackson Ruckar Because Chromebooks are mostly designed for running web applications like Google Docs, we use two different web benchmarks: Basemark and Speedometer. These test the processing power of the laptop in a web browser: for all of them, we used Google Chrome.Since most people will tote their Chromebooks around, brightness in different settings is important. We measure this with a colorimeter, a handheld device that measures luminance. We examine the white levels and black levels at max brightness and then again at 50% brightness.Finally, we test the battery life of each laptop to see how long they last between charges. With their displays adjusted to a moderate brightness of 200 nits, we set them to continuously cycle through popular websites. This simulates idle web browsing, and we time how long each laptop does it until the battery dies. We also consider human factors like how comfortable the screen is to look at and how easy the keyboard is to type on.What’s the Difference Between a Chromebook and a Laptop?Chromebooks stand apart from Macbooks and Windows laptops. ChromeOS isn’t a full-fledged operating system in the same sense as Windows or MacOS.You’ll be spending most of your time in the Chrome browser using web-based tools. You can install Android mobile apps for extra functionality, but it’s more limiting than using desktop-class software. Likewise, you’ll typically find less onboard storage. Instead, you’ll rely on cloud storage services like Google Drive.Without access to desktop-class software, you won’t be able to perform tasks like audio editing or install mandatory workplace software for most jobs. That may make this a poor

Basemark Web 3.0 scores - Overclock.net

Show that Brave is faster than Chrome on Android with a score of 250.97 against 217.56 on the Basemark Web 3.0 test. We conducted the tests on the same device with all other apps closed during the testing period. Brave should be your go-to browser on Android if these numbers matter to you.Is Google GX faster than Opera?Opera GX offers faster navigation than Chrome. You can choose between standard navigation and the Fast Navigation Button (FNB). Unlike Chrome, Opera GX comes with a free VPN to improve your security and privacy when browsing.Is Firefox good for low end PC?If you keep your number of chrome extensions to a minimum (or at least don’t go crazy) then it should run fine. If you want to run Firefox that’s just as good. It’ll probably run faster (if their claims are true) on a low end computer. It’s a great browser, but personally, I prefer chrome.Which browser uses least CPU?When it comes to CPU usage, Firefox is the clear winner. Mozilla claims that Firefox’s new Quantum engine uses around 30% less CPU than Chrome, nothing to sneeze at!Is Firefox good for low end PC?If you keep your number of chrome extensions to a minimum (or at least don’t go crazy) then it should run fine. If you want to run Firefox that’s just as good. It’ll probably run faster (if their claims are true) on a low end computer. It’s a great browser, but personally, I prefer chrome.Which browser uses least power?The three least energy-consuming browsers are: Vivaldi, Firefox Preview, Duck Duck Go.Which browser is lightest on CPU?Yes. Opera is known as one of the lightest browsers and consumes the least amount of resources in your system.What browser uses least CPU?When it comes to CPU usage, Firefox is the clear winner. Mozilla claims. Basemark offers a range of benchmarking tools, including Basemark GPU, Basemark Web 3.0, and Basemark Automotive. These tools cover a variety of scenarios, from gaming to web performance to Its world-renowned product portfolio includes VRScore, Basemark GPU Vulkan, Basemark ES, Basemark Web, Basemark OS and Basemark X. Basemark is headquartered in Helsinki, Finland. For more information, please visit

Basemark Web 3.0 Alpha - YouTube

That also means we can show the performance strengths per API. We'll have a look at that as well as accumulated results.So why are we so keen to look at API testing? Well, sometimes for an application (game) Vulkan can run faster than DirectX12. It gets even more complicated, often high-end graphics cards benefit from one API or the other. Look above at the Radeon RX 5600 XT. You can see that DirectX 12 is the fastest, and thus API of choice for this specific graphics card. Now you'd figure that to be the same for NVIDIA. Well, let's look at the chart below.So here we see the GeForce RTX 2060 is faster on the Vulkan API, at the same workload. It is a trend you'll see a lot throughout the test results. So as such, we find Basemark GPU, not just a wide platform benchmark, we find it to be a very interesting tool to measure API performance in a rather easy and fast manner. Share this content Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print